banner image
banner image

Aloisi & Meernik: Judgment Day: Judicial Decision Making at the International Criminal Tribunals

Rosa Aloisi (Trinity Univ.) & James Meernik (Univ. of North Texas) have published Judgment Day: Judicial Decision Making at the International Criminal Tribunals (Cambridge Univ. Press 2017). Here's the abstract:
This book demonstrates how, after many years of inactivity after the World War II tribunals, judges at the Yugoslav, Rwanda and Sierra Leone tribunals, and to a lesser extent the International Criminal Court, have seized the opportunity to develop international law on war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. Meernik and Aloisi argue that judges are motivated by a concern for human rights protection and the legacy of international criminal justice. They have progressively expanded the reach of international law to protect human rights and have used the power of their own words to condemn human rights atrocities. Judges have sentenced the guilty to lengthy and predictable terms in prison to provide justice, deterrence of future violations and even to advance peace and reconciliation. On judgment day, we show that judges have sought to enhance the power of international justice.
Aloisi & Meernik: Judgment Day: Judicial Decision Making at the International Criminal Tribunals Aloisi & Meernik: Judgment Day: Judicial Decision Making at the International Criminal Tribunals Reviewed by Ladi Michael on October 03, 2017 Rating: 5
Powered by Blogger.